Oleksij Rempel
2014-02-11 09:41:35 UTC
Hello all,
It is defently not new info, but it is probably better confirm it one
more time. We already know that not all ColorChecker SG are identical.
The same is about ColorChecker24 (or ColorChecker Classic).
First i had some doubts on my ColorMunki Photo, but other users confirm
it too: Some fields haw bigger difference then other. Here is one of
reports which confirm it:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.lexa.ru%2F2010%2F02%2F25%2Fpasportnye_dannye.html
In attachment is a file from X_Right software for Windows used as
reference data - just in keys. And this measurement was provided by
author of previous link:
http://blog.lexa.ru/files/ccpassport-10nm-avg2.txt
I thin it would be better if you can add big rad warning for all who
wont to bay ColorChecker (all variants) and do not have spectrometer. Or
recheck data if they have one.
It is defently not new info, but it is probably better confirm it one
more time. We already know that not all ColorChecker SG are identical.
The same is about ColorChecker24 (or ColorChecker Classic).
First i had some doubts on my ColorMunki Photo, but other users confirm
it too: Some fields haw bigger difference then other. Here is one of
reports which confirm it:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.lexa.ru%2F2010%2F02%2F25%2Fpasportnye_dannye.html
In attachment is a file from X_Right software for Windows used as
reference data - just in keys. And this measurement was provided by
author of previous link:
http://blog.lexa.ru/files/ccpassport-10nm-avg2.txt
I thin it would be better if you can add big rad warning for all who
wont to bay ColorChecker (all variants) and do not have spectrometer. Or
recheck data if they have one.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
Regards,
Oleksij